I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
香港外傭的困境：一旦懷孕就會「很恐懼」2026年1月6日，推荐阅读下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。获取更多信息
2026-02-27 00:00:00:0谭 盾3014247310http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/27/content_30142473.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/27/content_30142473.html11921 让九色鹿替我们“扯一把地气”（书里书外）。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
getChunks() { return chunks; }